Supersonic Wedge (Oblique Shock)

verification

Pressure field with the attached oblique shock
Static-pressure field on the quasi-2D plane; the planar oblique shock springs from the ramp corner at the angle β and leaves through the supersonic outlet.

Overview

A supersonic stream that is forced to turn into itself by a concave corner compresses through an oblique shock, a planar discontinuity, attached to the corner, across which the flow deflects by the wedge angle while its pressure, density and temperature jump and its Mach number drops. For a given freestream Mach number M1 and wedge half-angle θ the shock angle β follows from the exact θβM relation, and the post-shock state from the Rankine–Hugoniot jump conditions applied to the shock-normal Mach number. Below the detachment angle the relation has two roots; the smaller (weak-shock) root is the one realized on a slender wedge in a uniform stream.

Because the solution is closed-form and free of any empirical or turbulence modeling, it is used here to verify the solver's shock capturing and its compressible inviscid discretization: the shock should sit at the analytic angle and the captured post-shock state should match the analytic jump.

Problem Setup

A Mach-2 uniform stream enters a channel whose lower wall turns upward by θ=15 at a corner; the upper wall is parallel and the domain is tall enough that the shock leaves through the downstream boundary rather than reflecting back into the measurement region. The flow is modeled as inviscid (Euler), compressible and steady, with an ideal gas (γ=1.4). Both walls are slip boundaries, the inlet imposes the supersonic freestream, and the outlet is a supersonic pressure outlet that extrapolates the interior state. A second-order FDS scheme with a Venkatakrishnan slope limiter is used, the limiter providing the monotone reconstruction at the discontinuity.

The grid is a structured compression-ramp mesh built so the ramp angle is exactly 15, with the resolution concentrated to capture a sharp, planar shock. For M1=2 and θ=15 the deflection is well below the detachment angle, so the shock is attached and the weak-shock branch applies.

Quantities of Interest

The verification quantities are the shock geometry and the post-shock state:

Each is compared to the exact θβM and Rankine–Hugoniot result for M1=2, θ=15, γ=1.4.

Sources

Ames Research Staff, "Equations, Tables, and Charts for Compressible Flow," NACA Report 1135, 1953.: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930091059
Authoritative tabulation of the oblique-shock (θ–β–M) relation and the Rankine–Hugoniot normal-shock jump conditions used as the analytic reference.

Results

Oblique-shock angle and post-shock state vs the θ–β–M solution

Sourceβ [deg]p2/p1M2T2/T1
Luminary 45.2312.19511.44211.2713
Analytic 45.3442.19471.44571.2694

Shock angle β (fitted from the captured pressure jump) and the uniform post-shock p2/p1, M2, T2/T1.

Static pressure across the shock

Static pressure across the shock
Pressure along the horizontal cut y=0.5: the captured jump rises from the freestream to the analytic post-shock level.

Reference: Ames Research Staff, "Equations, Tables, and Charts for Compressible Flow," NACA Report 1135, 1953. (θ–β–M relation and normal-shock relations for M1=2, θ=15, γ=1.4): https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930091059

Solver configuration

features exercised
Verification2DInviscidIdeal gasSteadyEnergy equation