RAE 2822 Transonic Airfoil: Validation (SA)

validation

Velocity field over the RAE 2822 at \( M = 0.734 \)
Velocity-magnitude field around the RAE 2822 (finest grid) at M=0.734, α=2.79; the upper-surface supersonic pocket terminated by the mid-chord shock is visible.

Overview

The RAE 2822 is a supercritical aerofoil section whose transonic wind-tunnel campaign, documented in AGARD Advisory Report 138 by Cook, McDonald and Firmin, is a recurring validation benchmark in computational aerodynamics. The measurements include surface pressure distributions together with boundary-layer and wake surveys, across a range of Mach numbers and incidences in a compressible, shocked flow.

This case reproduces the report's Case 9 at the corrected free-stream conditions M=0.734, α=2.79 and Re=6.5×106. These are the free-air conditions adopted by the High-Order CFD Workshop, obtained by correcting the wind-tunnel reference values (M=0.730, α=3.19) for tunnel-wall interference. At these conditions a supersonic pocket forms over the forward upper surface and is terminated by a near-normal shock near mid-chord. The Luminary Spalart–Allmaras solution is compared to the measured surface pressure and to the reported lift and drag.

Problem Setup

The aerofoil has unit chord and lies in the x–y plane at α=2.79; the integrated surface force is projected onto the wind axes to recover lift and drag. The fluid is ideal-gas air with Sutherland viscosity at a free-stream Mach number of 0.734; the static pressure is set so the chord Reynolds number equals 6.5×106, and the reference pressure and velocity follow the free stream so that the force-coefficient and pressure normalizations are exact. Turbulence is modeled with Spalart–Allmaras, the discretization is second-order, and each run is driven to a deep residual floor. Transition is fixed near the leading edge, as in the workshop specification.

The boundary conditions are a no-slip adiabatic wall on the aerofoil and a Riemann far field on the outer boundary. The study is run as a grid-convergence sweep over the workshop's five nested, body-fitted grids around the section, from a 506-cell grid to a 129,536-cell grid. The experimental data are the Case-9 surface pressures and forces from AGARD AR-138, digitized from the report.

Quantities of Interest

The validation quantities are the surface pressure coefficient Cp(x/c), including the chordwise location of the upper-surface shock, and the integrated lift and drag coefficients. Lift and drag are tracked across the grid family as a function of the grid spacing h=(1/N)1/2 to assess grid convergence, and the finest-grid values are tabulated beside the AGARD Case-9 measurements; the finest-grid pressure distribution is overlaid on the measured Cp. On the finest grid (129,536 cells) Luminary returns CL=0.793, within 1.2% of the measured CL=0.803, and CD=0.0188 against the measured CD=0.0168. Transonic drag combines wave drag from the shock with the viscous contribution, so the comparison reflects both the shock capturing and the boundary-layer response of the turbulence model.

Sources

High-Order CFD Workshop, Case C2.2: "RANS: RAE 2822" (corrected free-stream conditions and computational grid family).: https://cfd.ku.edu/hiocfd/case_c2.2.html
Corrected conditions M=0.734, α=2.79, Re=6.5×106 (free-air, from the tunnel reference M=0.730, α=3.19); transition fixed at 3% chord; nested linear grid family (``rae2822_level{1..5}.msh``).
P. H. Cook, M. A. McDonald and M. C. P. Firmin, "Aerofoil RAE 2822: Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements," AGARD Advisory Report No. 138, 1979.: https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/Bradshaw/d2/f8621.txt
Case 9: measured surface Cp and integrated CL/CD. Surface-pressure points digitized from the report (via the SU2 test suite); the RAE 2822 dataset is hosted on the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource.

Results

Lift and drag at Case 9 vs experiment

CodeCLCD
Luminary 0.793190.018765
AGARD case 9 (exp.) 0.8030.0168

Values on the finest grid (129,536 cells, \( \alpha = 2.79^\circ \)).

Wind-axis CL and CD on the finest grid at M=0.734, α=2.79, Re=6.5×106, compared to the AGARD Case-9 measurements.

Grid convergence of CL

Grid convergence of \( C_L \)

Reference: P. H. Cook, M. A. McDonald and M. C. P. Firmin, "Aerofoil RAE 2822: Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements," AGARD Advisory Report No. 138, 1979. (CL/CD, Case 9): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/Bradshaw/d2/f8621.txt

Grid convergence of CD

Grid convergence of \( C_D \)

Reference: P. H. Cook, M. A. McDonald and M. C. P. Firmin, "Aerofoil RAE 2822: Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements," AGARD Advisory Report No. 138, 1979. (CL/CD, Case 9): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/Bradshaw/d2/f8621.txt

Surface pressure coefficient Cp(x/c) at Case 9

Surface pressure coefficient \( C_p(x/c) \) at Case 9
Surface pressure coefficient on the finest grid at AGARD Case 9. The shock appears as the sharp pressure recovery near mid-chord on the upper surface.

Reference: P. H. Cook, M. A. McDonald and M. C. P. Firmin, "Aerofoil RAE 2822: Pressure Distributions, and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements," AGARD Advisory Report No. 138, 1979. (surface Cp, Case 9): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/Bradshaw/d2/f8621.txt

Solver configuration

features exercised
Validation2DRANSSpalart–AllmarasIdeal gasSteadyEnergy equation