Generic Truck Utility (GTU): DDES

Flagship benchmark showcase

Instantaneous velocity-magnitude field
Instantaneous velocity magnitude (0-52 m/s) on the GTU center plane for the 4x2 baseline, showing the turbulent wake resolved by the DDES.

Overview

The Generic Truck Utility (GTU) is an open, realistic generic pickup-truck and SUV model introduced by Ford to give the automotive-aerodynamics community a shared, non-proprietary geometry for trucks and SUVs, in the same spirit as the DrivAer model for passenger cars. The full-scale model is modular, supporting many part configurations.

This is a flagship benchmark. Luminary computed the GTU with a Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES), a hybrid RANS-LES, scale-resolving transient simulation of the full vehicle. The results reproduced here are taken from Luminary's own summary and are not recomputed in this repository. The emphasis is the accuracy of geometry-induced force deltas: how the drag and lift change when individual parts are removed from the baseline, compared against both the Ford experiment and Ford CFD.

Problem Setup

The geometry is the GTU in the 4x2 baseline configuration plus two part-removal variants: side mirrors removed, and the chin spoiler (front airdam) removed. The flow uses the ideal-gas coupled solver with Sutherland's-law viscosity, a second-order spatial discretization with no limiters, and a BDF2 implicit time integration at Δt=CTU/500; the run advances 20,000 steps with statistics collected from iteration 2,000.

Turbulence is treated with Spalart-Allmaras DDES. The formulation adds a shear-layer-adapted length scale with a vortex-tilting measure for grey-area mitigation, a shielding function to protect attached boundary layers from premature switching, and a blended centered/upwind convective scheme to limit dissipation in the LES regions. The mesh is a 122-million-cell SnappyHexMesh grid with distance-based refinement and mirrored wake refinement boxes, 5 boundary-layer layers at an expansion ratio of 1.2, and a target y+20--35 on the body surfaces, which carry wall functions. Boundary conditions are a far-field inlet and a pressure outlet, slip walls upstream and on the ceiling and side walls, five translating wind-tunnel belts with rotating wheels, and a no-slip floor near and downstream of the body.

Quantities of Interest

The primary quantities are the time-averaged force coefficients CD and CL for each configuration and, as the validation focus, the geometry-induced increments from the 4x2 baseline. For the baseline, Luminary reports CD=0.4460 and CL=0.2101; the corresponding Ford experimental CD is 0.3930, so the absolute drag sits about 0.05 above the tunnel value across configurations. Removing the mirrors changes the drag by ΔCD=0.0106 (Luminary), compared with 0.010 from Ford CFD and 0.012 from the Ford experiment. Removing the chin spoiler changes the drag by ΔCD=+0.0349 (Luminary), compared with +0.035 from Ford CFD and +0.028 from the Ford experiment. The lift increments from Luminary are ΔCL=+0.0054 for mirror removal and +0.1352 for chin-spoiler removal. Field quantities include the instantaneous and time-averaged velocity-magnitude fields on the vehicle center plane.

Sources

S. Woodiga, K. Howard, P. Norman, N. Lewington, R. Carstairs, B. Hupertz, and K. Chalupa, "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020.: https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664
Introduces the Ford Generic Truck Utility (GTU) open generic pickup/SUV model and reports wind-tunnel force coefficients for its configurations.
European Car Aerodynamics Research Association (ECARA), "Generic Truck Utility (GTU): Data Exchange.": https://www.ecara.org/driveaer/gtu
Open GTU geometry and reference data exchange.

Results

These results are reproduced from Luminary's published workshop submission (see Sources).

Geometry-induced drag increments ΔCD

SourceΔCD (mirror removal)ΔCD (chin-spoiler removal)
Luminary -0.0106+0.0349
Ford CFD -0.010+0.035
Ford experiment -0.012+0.028

Change in time-averaged drag coefficient from the 4x2 baseline for each part removal: Luminary SA-DDES beside the Ford experiment and Ford CFD increments.

Reference: S. Woodiga, K. Howard, P. Norman, N. Lewington, R. Carstairs, B. Hupertz, and K. Chalupa, "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020. (geometry-induced drag increments): https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664

Drag increment ΔCD by configuration

Drag increment \( \Delta C_D \) by configuration
Geometry-induced ΔCD (from the 4x2 baseline) for mirror removal and chin-spoiler removal: Luminary, Ford CFD, and the Ford experiment.

Reference: S. Woodiga, K. Howard, P. Norman, N. Lewington, R. Carstairs, B. Hupertz, and K. Chalupa, "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020. (drag increments): https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664

Absolute drag coefficient CD by configuration

Absolute drag coefficient \( C_D \) by configuration
Time-averaged CD for the baseline, mirror-removal and chin-spoiler-removal configurations: Luminary versus the Ford experiment.

Reference: S. Woodiga, K. Howard, P. Norman, N. Lewington, R. Carstairs, B. Hupertz, and K. Chalupa, "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020. (absolute drag coefficients per configuration): https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664

Lift increment ΔCL by configuration

Lift increment \( \Delta C_L \) by configuration
Geometry-induced ΔCL (from the 4x2 baseline) for mirror removal and chin-spoiler removal, from Luminary.

Reference: S. Woodiga, K. Howard, P. Norman, N. Lewington, R. Carstairs, B. Hupertz, and K. Chalupa, "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020. (lift increments): https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664

Absolute lift coefficient CL by configuration

Absolute lift coefficient \( C_L \) by configuration
Time-averaged CL for the baseline, mirror-removal and chin-spoiler-removal configurations, from Luminary.

Reference: S. Woodiga, K. Howard, P. Norman, N. Lewington, R. Carstairs, B. Hupertz, and K. Chalupa, "The GTU: A New Realistic Generic Pickup Truck and SUV Model," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0664, 2020. (absolute lift coefficients per configuration): https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0664

Time-averaged velocity-magnitude field

Time-averaged velocity-magnitude field
Time-averaged velocity magnitude (0-52 m/s) on the GTU center plane for the 4x2 baseline, showing the mean separated wake.

Solver configuration

features exercised
VerificationValidation3DDES/LESSpalart–AllmarasIdeal gasUnsteadyEnergy equation