NASA CRM: AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop 6

Flagship benchmark showcase

Surface pressure on the NASA CRM Wing-Body at \( M = 0.85 \)
Surface pressure coefficient over the NASA CRM Wing-Body (Luminary).

Overview

The NASA Common Research Model (CRM) is a transonic transport configuration that serves as the reference geometry for the AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop series. The workshops compare computed forces and surface pressures against wind-tunnel measurements across many independent solvers. The sixth workshop (DPW-6, 2016) addressed the CRM Wing-Body at its transonic cruise design point.

This is a flagship validation benchmark. Luminary entered the workshop case, and the results reproduced here are taken from that published case study. Two turbulence models, the Spalart–Allmaras Standard model and Menter's k-ω SST-2003m model, are run at the same conditions, and the surface pressure distributions are compared against the NASA wind-tunnel data. The figures and force coefficients on this page are taken from the published case study; they are not recomputed in this repository.

Problem Setup

The geometry is the CRM Wing-Body. The flow is compressible (ideal-gas air) at a free-stream Mach number of M=0.85 and a chord Reynolds number of Re=5×106; the incidence is trimmed so that the lift coefficient is held at the workshop design value CL=0.5. No-slip adiabatic walls are imposed on the aircraft surfaces and a Riemann far field on the outer boundary.

The mesh has roughly 71 million control volumes, with the first cell off the wall sized so that y+1 over the wing and fuselage surfaces (a low-Reynolds-number wall-resolved mesh without wall functions). The two turbulence models, the Spalart–Allmaras Standard model and Menter's k-ω SST-2003m model, are run at these same conditions.

Quantities of Interest

The validation quantities are the surface pressure coefficient Cp(x/c) at three spanwise stations and the integrated force coefficients at the fixed CL=0.5: the total drag CD and its pressure-drag component CDp.

The pressure distributions are reported at three semi-span stations, η=0.95, 0.73 and 0.13 (95%, 72.68% and 13.1% of the semi-span), shown left to right. At each station the distributions from both turbulence models are overlaid on the NASA wind-tunnel measurements, so the chordwise loading on the upper and lower surfaces can be read directly across the span.

For the Spalart–Allmaras Standard model at CL=0.5, the integrated total drag is CD=0.0258 and the pressure-drag component is CDp=0.0143. The range reported by the DPW-6 participants is CD=0.02540.0263 and CDp=0.01400.0152.

Sources

Luminary Cloud, "NASA CRM: Drag Prediction Workshop 6 (2016)": case study (SA Standard and SST-2003m vs. NASA wind-tunnel data).: https://luminarycloud.com
Luminary's published DPW-6 NASA CRM Wing-Body case study: surface Cp at three span stations and integrated CL/CD/CDp at M=0.85, CL=0.5, Re=5×106.
6th AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW-6), Washington, D.C., 2016: NASA Common Research Model Wing-Body.: https://dpw.larc.nasa.gov/DPW6/
Workshop test case definition, common grids and the NASA wind-tunnel reference data for the CRM Wing-Body at the cruise design point.

Results

These results are reproduced from Luminary's published workshop submission (see Sources).

Surface pressure Cp(x/c) at three span stations

Surface pressure \( C_p(x/c) \) at three span stations
Surface Cp(x/c) at three semi-span stations, η=0.95, 0.73, 0.13 (outboard to inboard, left to right).

Reference: Luminary Cloud, "NASA CRM: Drag Prediction Workshop 6 (2016)": case study (SA Standard and SST-2003m vs. NASA wind-tunnel data). (surface Cp at 13.1%, 72.68% and 95% semi-span): https://luminarycloud.com

Integrated force coefficients at CL=0.5

CFD solverCLCDCDp
Luminary (SA) 0.50.02580.0143
DPW-6 participants 0.50.0254–0.02630.0140–0.0152

Integrated coefficients at the fixed CL=0.5 cruise point, against the range reported by DPW-6 participants.

Reference: Luminary Cloud, "NASA CRM: Drag Prediction Workshop 6 (2016)": case study (SA Standard and SST-2003m vs. NASA wind-tunnel data). (integrated force coefficients at CL=0.5): https://luminarycloud.com

Solver configuration

features exercised
VerificationValidation3DRANSSpalart–Allmarask–ω SSTIdeal gasSteadyEnergy equation