2D Coflowing Jet (Compressible Mixing Layer, SST)

verification

Velocity field of the coflowing mixing layer
Velocity-magnitude field on the quasi-2D plane (finest grid); the two streams meet at the splitter trailing edge and mix downstream.

Overview

The 2D coflowing jet is a compressible free-shear verification case: two parallel streams of differing speed meet at the sharp trailing edge of a thin splitter plate and develop into a planar mixing layer downstream. With no wall bounding the shear layer and no separation, the case isolates a turbulence model's behavior in free shear, its spreading rate, its centerline velocity decay, and its eddy viscosity.

This case is the companion of the Spalart–Allmaras coflowing jet, run instead with Luminary's k-ω SST model (the Menter SST-2003m variant). The goal is code-to-code verification: to reproduce, on the same grids, the results the NASA Turbulence Modeling Resource (TMR) publishes for its reference codes CFL3D and FUN3D with their SST model. The TMR publishes its SST shear-layer data as the SST-Vm variant (vorticity-based production term); Luminary runs SST-2003m (strain-based). The reference series are labeled "SST-Vm" to name the exact published variant.

This is a grid-convergence study: the case is solved on a family of five successively refined structured grids (each a 2× refinement), and the integrated and profile quantities are tracked as the mesh is refined toward the continuum (grid spacing h=(1/N)1/20).

Problem Setup

The inner stream enters at M=0.5 and the outer (co-flowing) stream at M0.254, giving the velocity ratio that drives the mixing layer. The Reynolds number is Re=50,000 based on a unit reference length. The two streams are separated, upstream of the trailing edge, by a thin splitter plate modeled as a zero-thickness two-sided adiabatic no-slip wall occupying 10x0 at y=0.5; the mixing layer develops over the downstream region 0x200, with the centerline (y=0) and the far top boundary treated as symmetry planes.

Each inflow is imposed as a total-pressure (subsonic) inlet with the exact TMR stagnation ratios, the inner stream at Pt/P=1.1862, Tt/T=1.05 and the outer stream at Pt/P=1.046, Tt/T=1.0, and the downstream boundary as a static back-pressure outlet at P/P=1.0. Air is modeled as an ideal gas with a constant molecular viscosity set so that Re=50,000, and turbulence closure is the k-ω SST (SST-2003m) model, with the free stream set to the TMR turbulence values (μt/μ=0.009) via direct k/ω inflow. Each grid is converged in pseudo-time (continuity residual driven below 109) so that the remaining error is spatial.

Quantities of Interest

Velocities are reported as u/a (normalized by the free-stream speed of sound), matching the TMR data convention, so the inner core reads 0.5. The verification targets are those published on the NASA TMR SST expected-results page:

Sources

NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model).: https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html
Reference CD, centerline u/a, velocity profiles and eddy-viscosity data from the NASA CFL3D and FUN3D codes (SST-Vm variant).

Results

Finest-grid splitter CD vs CFL3D / FUN3D

CodeCD (splitter)
Luminary 0.0056776
CFL3D (SST-Vm) 0.00573
FUN3D (SST-Vm) 0.0057092

Values on the finest grid (129×257 / 129×257 / 513×513).

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model).: https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Grid convergence of splitter CD

Grid convergence of splitter \( C_D \)

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model). (CFL3D / FUN3D (SST-Vm), grid convergence of splitter CD): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Centerline velocity decay u/a along y=0

Centerline velocity decay \( u/a_\infty \) along \( y = 0 \)

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model). (CFL3D / FUN3D (SST-Vm), centerline u/a vs x): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Velocity profile u/a vs y at x=2.72

Velocity profile \( u/a_\infty \) vs \( y \) at \( x = 2.72 \)

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model). (CFL3D / FUN3D (SST-Vm), u/a vs y at x=2.72): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Velocity profile u/a vs y at x=29.2

Velocity profile \( u/a_\infty \) vs \( y \) at \( x = 29.2 \)

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model). (CFL3D / FUN3D (SST-Vm), u/a vs y at x=29.2): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Velocity profile u/a vs y at x=95.5

Velocity profile \( u/a_\infty \) vs \( y \) at \( x = 95.5 \)

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model). (CFL3D / FUN3D (SST-Vm), u/a vs y at x=95.5): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Eddy-viscosity profile μt/μ at x=29.2

Eddy-viscosity profile \( \mu_t/\mu_\infty \) at \( x = 29.2 \)

Reference: NASA Langley Turbulence Modeling Resource, "2D Coflowing Jet Verification Case" (SST model). (CFL3D / FUN3D (SST-Vm), μt/μ vs y at x=29.2): https://tmbwg.github.io/turbmodels/shear_sstv.html

Solver configuration

features exercised
Verification2DRANSk–ω SSTIdeal gasSteadyEnergy equation